{"id":5845,"date":"2022-09-16T08:09:50","date_gmt":"2022-09-16T06:09:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/?page_id=5845"},"modified":"2022-10-28T12:42:28","modified_gmt":"2022-10-28T10:42:28","slug":"1-4","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/en\/sample-page\/arhiv\/2022-2\/3-117\/1-4\/","title":{"rendered":"1.4"},"content":{"rendered":"
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION IN RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS: EVOLUTION OF METHODOLOGIES<\/strong> \u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n I.Yu. YEGOROV<\/strong> 1 <\/sup><\/strong> Nauka naukozn. 2022, 3(117): 36\u201350 Section<\/strong>: Problems\u2009of\u2009the\u2009development\u2009of\u2009science\u2009and\u2009technology\u2009potential The article highlights trends in performance evaluation of research organizations of Ukraine, based on foreign experiences and results obtained in the first cycle of the evaluation of research organizations of the NAS of Ukraine (2016\u20132021), with providing recommendations for further improvements in evaluation methods and procedures. Research methods: analysis, generalization of scientific sources of information, synthesis and comparison. Source base: data on the evaluation of research organizations of the NAS of Ukraine, regulatory framework for the evaluation of research organizations, publications of Ukrainian and foreign specialists.<\/p>\n It is emphasized the presently research organizations of the NAS of Ukraine are evaluated using two official evaluation techniques, which main difference is the method for evaluation: professional assessment of the organization\u2019s performance by qualified experts (the methodology of the NAS Ukraine) and formalized self-assessment of the organizations based on quantitative indicators that can be adjusted in a way by a group of experts (the methodology of the Ukrainian Ministry of Education and Science). The problems of constructing a composite indicator to be used for ranking are discussed, with a review of researches\u2019 positions.<\/p>\n The conclusions are made about the unreliability of metrics for evaluating the performance of research organizations and the need to adopt expert evaluation methods supplemented by quantitative indicators. It is emphasized that evaluation results can be made more robust through inviting as many as possible foreign researchers as experts. This approach is in line with global trends in the evaluation of research organizations.<\/p>\n Keywords<\/strong>: research organization, methodology for evaluating the performance of research organization, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, methodology of evaluating the performance of R&D and innovation activities of research organization, higher education establishments, universities, ranking, Chinese Academy of Sciences.<\/strong><\/p>\n References<\/strong><\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3829-6383
\n<\/a>\u0406<\/strong>.A. ZHUKOVYCH<\/strong> 1
\n<\/sup><\/strong>https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5027-5991
\n<\/a>1 <\/sup>Center for Evaluation of Activity of Research Institutions and Scientific Support of Regional Development of Ukraine of the N\u0410S of Ukraine<\/p>\n
\nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.15407\/sofs2022.03.036<\/a><\/p>\n
\nLanguage:<\/strong> Ukrainian
\nAbstract:<\/strong> The article is devoted to a topical issue of performance evaluation in research organizations. Methodological approaches to the evaluation of research organizations, which results determine the amount of their basic funding, require constant improvement of procedures, being subject of numerous studies. This issue is especially relevant for the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) of Ukraine as the largest R&D center in the research system of Ukraine. Robust and regular performance evaluation of research organizations of the NAS of Ukraine will help increase their efficiency, make distribution of funding more transparent, improve reporting on the use of budget funds, reorganize their network in a rational way.<\/p>\n\n