{"id":6317,"date":"2023-03-15T16:31:08","date_gmt":"2023-03-15T14:31:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/?page_id=6317"},"modified":"2023-04-03T13:46:48","modified_gmt":"2023-04-03T11:46:48","slug":"1-8","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/en\/sample-page\/arhiv\/2023-2\/1-119\/1-8\/","title":{"rendered":"1.8"},"content":{"rendered":"

THE SPECIFIC FEATURES OF THE FACTOR OF UNDERSTANDING IN THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATIONS<\/strong><\/p>\n

G.Ya. SHEVCHENKO<\/strong>1
\n<\/sup>https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3984-9266
\n<\/a>\u041e<\/strong>.\u0410<\/strong>. MARCHENKO<\/strong>1
\n<\/sup>https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7665-7832
\n<\/a>S.E. SHABLII<\/strong>1
\n<\/sup>https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6520-6902
\n<\/a>1 <\/sup>Association Noosphere, Dnipro, Ukraine<\/p>\n

Nauka naukozn. 2023, 1(119): 81\u2014<\/strong>101
\nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.15407\/sofs2023.01.081<\/a><\/p>\n

Section<\/strong>: Vital\u2009Problems\u2009of\u2009Modern\u2009Science
\nLanguage:<\/strong> English
\nAbstract:<\/strong> The article contains results of analysis of science communication (SC) that takes place between such actors as science, business, government and society. In particular, the communication gap between the above-mentioned actors is investigated. The relevance of this topic is proved by numerous publications of national and foreign researchers. It is known that the success of communication largely depends on the understanding and perception of the information message (IM) that is sent to the recipient. Their absence leads to communication gaps, which reduces the effectiveness of science communications up to complete misunderstanding. The aim of the study is to identify and structure such gaps, as well as to find ways to overcome them in order to increase the efficiency and successful design of scientific communications. The empirical basis of the study is the scientific works of leading domestic and foreign scientists. The research methods are the principle of ascent from the abstract to the concrete (Hegelian principle), as well as general scientific methods of cognition: analysis, synthesis, generalization, scientific deduction and induction. The conducted research demonstrates that the difference in mental models and thesauri of communicants leads to communicative gaps in understanding\u00a0\u2014 representational gaps, which in foreign literature are termed as rGaps. Such gaps occur when the communicators give the information message a meaning that the recipients do not realize, thus creating a conflict in the meaning and value of the transmitted information. It is concluded that the design of a successful SC should take into account the understanding factor along with its accompanying fascination. Mechanisms and techniques that contribute to the elimination of representational gaps are proposed, which in some cases make it possible to find a solution to the problem of understanding in the SC.<\/p>\n

Keywords<\/strong>:\u00a0<\/strong>noosphere, science communication, communication gaps, gaps in understanding, understanding of the information message, fascination, representative gap, perception gap.<\/strong><\/p>\n

References<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Bultitude, K. (2011). The Why and How of Science Communication. Science Communication. Rosulek,\u00a0P. (Ed.). 1\u201418. Pilsen: European Commission.<\/li>\n
  2. DeWitt, J., & Bultitude, K. (2018). Space Science: the View from European School Students. Research in Science Education, 50(5), 1943-1959. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11165-018-9759-y<\/a><\/li>\n
  3. Illingworth, S. (2017). Delivering effective science communication: advice from a professional science communicator. Seminars in cell\u00a0& developmental biology, 70, 10\u201416. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.semcdb.2017.04.002<\/a><\/li>\n
  4. Jucan, M.S., & Jucan, C.N. (2014). The Power of Science Communication.\u00a0 Procedia \u2014 Social and Behavioral Sciences,\u00a0149, 461\u2014466. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.sbspro.2014.08.288<\/a><\/li>\n
  5. Cronin, M.A., & Weingart, L.R. (2019). Conflict across representational gaps: Threats to and opportunities for improved communication.\u00a0Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,\u00a0116(16), 7642\u20147649. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1805866116<\/a><\/li>\n
  6. Singh, S.D., & Marusak, H.A. (2021). Bridging the gap: preparing the next generation of brain scientists to communicate with the general public and lawmakers.\u00a0Neuropsychopharmacology,\u00a046(13), 2233\u20142234. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41386-021-01084-5<\/a><\/li>\n
  7. Luna, M., & Velasco, J.L. (2003). Bridging the Gap between Firms and Academic Institutions.\u00a0Industry and Higher Education,\u00a017(5), 313\u2014323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5367\/000000003773007247<\/a><\/li>\n
  8. Dmitrevskaya, I.V. (2010). Communicative space of the noosphere.\u00a0 Philosophy, 2, 9\u201425 [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  9. Yanenko, L.P. (2020). Possibilities of cognitive linguistics against cognitive dissonance. Proceedings from: Ukrainian online-conference \u201cActual problems of foreign language communication: linguistic, methodical and socio-psychological aspects\u201d, 269\u2014271. Lutsk: NTU [in Ukrainian].<\/li>\n
  10. Terenteva, N.O. (2021). Noosphere education in the context of sustainable development: the university sector.\u00a0Science and Education a New Dimension,\u00a02, 38\u201441 [in Ukrainian].<\/li>\n
  11. Czik\u0456n, V.O. (2007).\u00a0Globalization: a noospheric approach.\u00a0Sumy: SumDPU [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  12. K\u0456slov, D.V. (2014). The importance of communications as an element in the development of the noosphere.\u00a0State and regions,\u00a03(19), 4\u20147 [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  13. L\u0456shhitovich, L.I. (2019).\u00a0Noosphere.\u00a0Kiev: L\u0456ra [in Ukrainian].<\/li>\n
  14. Hunter, P. (2016). The communications gap between scientists and public.\u00a0EMBO reports,\u00a017(11), 1513\u20141515. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15252\/embr.201643379<\/a><\/li>\n
  15. Binoy, V.V. (2017). Introduction: When Science Meets the Public\u2014Bridging the Gap.\u00a0Bridging the Communication Gap in Science and Technology, 1\u20149. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-981-10-1025-5_1<\/a><\/li>\n
  16. Zhang, L., Malviya, S., Tandoc, E.C., & Ho, S.S. (2022). Exploring channels and gaps in information dissemination and acquisition among energy scientists and the public: The Southeast Asian context. PLOS ONE, 17(8), 1\u201417. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0273626<\/a><\/li>\n
  17. Pobol, A.I. (2012). Partnership of business, government and science for innovative development of regions.\u00a0Interaction of business, state, science: a view from three sides on economic development, 1, 67\u201478. Minsk: Belorussian State University [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  18. Medvedeva, S.M. (2014). From scientific innovation to popularization of science: a theoretical model toc of science communication.\u00a0MGIMO Review of International Relations, 4(37), 278\u2014286. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.24833\/2071-8160-2014-4-37-278-286<\/a> [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  19. Barysheva, A.V. Economy of knowledge: a new paradigm of scientific knowledge. URL: https:\/\/spkurdyumov.ru\/philosophy\/ekonomika-znanij\/ (last accessed: 04.10.2022) [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  20. Kahlor, L.A., & Stout, P. (2010).\u00a0Communicating science: new agendas in communication.\u00a0New York: Routledge. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780203867631<\/a><\/li>\n
  21. Gregory, J., & Miller, S. (2000). Science in Public. Cambridge: Basic Books.<\/li>\n
  22. Irwin, A. (1996). Misunderstanding Science? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<\/li>\n
  23. Wynne, B. (1992). Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science.\u00a0Public Understanding of Science,\u00a01(3), 281\u2014304. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1088\/0963-6625\/1\/3\/004<\/a><\/li>\n
  24. Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (2008). Handbook of public communication of science and technology. London: Routledge. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780203928240<\/a><\/li>\n
  25. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, (2009). Challenging futures of science in society: emerging trends and cutting-edge issues: report of the MASIS expert group setup by the European Commission, Publications Office.\u00a0URL: https:\/\/data.europa.eu\/doi\/10.2777\/467<\/li>\n
  26. Gross, A.G. (1990).\u00a0The rhetoric of science.\u00a0Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.<\/li>\n
  27. Shevchenko, G.Y., & Bilozubenko, V.S. (2019). Structural Model of Scientific Communications.\u00a0 Science and Science of Science,\u00a04, 37\u201451. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15407\/sofs2019.04.037<\/a> [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  28. Musxelishvili, N.L., & Shrejder, Y.A. (1997). Information and fascination in direct and indirect communication. Scientifi c and technical information, 2(8), 1\u20147 [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  29. Nazarov, M.M. (1999).\u00a0Mass communication in the modern world.\u00a0Moscow: USSR [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  30. Shannon, C.E. & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.<\/li>\n
  31. Yakobson, R.O. (1985).\u00a0Speech communication; Language in relation to other communication systems.\u00a0Moscow: Progress [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  32. Kibrik, A.E. (1987).\u00a0Modeling of language activity in intelligent systems.\u00a0Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  33. Pocheptsov, G.G. (1986). Fundamentals of pragmatic sentence description. Kyiv: Vsshaya shkola [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  34. Makarov, M.L. (2003). Fundamentals of discourse theory. Moscow: Gnozis [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  35. Grajs, G.P. (1985).\u00a0Logic and verbal communication.\u00a0Moscow: Progress [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  36. Searle, J.R. (1969).\u00a0Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language.\u00a0Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9781139173438<\/a><\/li>\n
  37. Newcomb, T.M. (1953). An approach to the study of communicative acts.\u00a0Psychological Review,\u00a060(6), 393\u2014404. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/h0063098<\/a><\/li>\n
  38. McLuhan, H.M. (1951). The Mechanical Bride: Folklore of Industrial Man. New York: Vanguard Press.<\/li>\n
  39. Bakhtin, M.M. (1995). Man in the word world. Moscow: Russian Open University [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  40. Pocheptsov, G.G. (2001).\u00a0Communication theory.\u00a0Kyiv: Vakler [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  41. Pospelov, D.A. (1989). Intelligent interfaces for computers of new generations.\u00a0Electronic computing, 3, 4\u201420 [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  42. Shevchenko, G.A., Bilozubenko, V.S., & Marchenko, O.\u0410. (2020). Identification and mechanisms for bridging the divide in different types of scientific communications. Science and Science of Science, 4, 44\u201462. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15407\/sofs2020.04.044<\/a><\/li>\n
  43. Shrejder, Y.A. (1974).\u00a0The logic of sign systems.\u00a0Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  44. Pereverzev, V.N. (2002). Metalogical aspects of communication theory.\u00a0Communication Theory & Applied Communication, 1, 118\u2014128 [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  45. Mo\u0456seeva, N.\u0406. (2014). Globalization trends in the field of social communications.\u00a0Bulletin of the Kharkiv State Academy of Culture, 43, 110\u2014119 [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  46. Ilganaeva, V.A. (2009).\u00a0Social communications (theory, methodology, activity): dictionary-reference.\u00a0Kharkiv: City Typography [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  47. Sokolov, A.V. (2002).\u00a0 Communication in modern science.\u00a0 St. Petersburg: Publishing house Mixajlova V.A. [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  48. Oseledchik, M. B. (2002) Control logic. \u041coscow: Moscow State University of Food Production [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  49. Petrov, Y.A., & Zaharov, A.A. (2006).\u00a0General methodology of thinking.\u00a0Moscow: Company Sputnik+ [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  50. Strugaczkij, A., & Strugaczkij, B. (2016).\u00a0Waves dampen the wind.\u00a0Moscow: AST [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  51. Licklider, J.C.R., & Taylor, R.W. (1968). The Computer as a Communication Device. Science and Technology, 76, 21\u201438.<\/li>\n
  52. Collins, R. (2002). The sociology of philosophies. Novosibirsk: Siberian Chronograph [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  53. Lefevr, V.A. (1968). Algebra of conflict. Moscow: Znaniye [in Russian].<\/li>\n
  54. Adler, Y.P., & Granovskij, Y.V. (2017).\u00a0Planning an experiment working with data.\u00a0Dnipro: Lira [in Russian].<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Full Text (PDF)<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    THE SPECIFIC FEATURES OF THE FACTOR OF UNDERSTANDING IN THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATIONS G.Ya. SHEVCHENKO1 https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3984-9266 \u041e.\u0410. MARCHENKO1 https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7665-7832 S.E. SHABLII1 https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6520-6902 1 Association Noosphere, Dnipro, Ukraine Nauka naukozn. 2023, 1(119): 81\u2014101 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15407\/sofs2023.01.081 Section: Vital\u2009Problems\u2009of\u2009Modern\u2009Science Language: English Abstract: The article contains results of analysis of science communication (SC) that takes place between such actors as science, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":6285,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"translation":{"provider":"WPGlobus","version":"2.12.2","language":"en","enabled_languages":["uk","en","ru"],"languages":{"uk":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"en":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"ru":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false}}},"yoast_head":"\n1.8 - Science and Science of Science<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/arhiv\/2023-2\/1-119\/1-8\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"1.8 - Science and Science of Science\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/arhiv\/2023-2\/1-119\/1-8\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Science and Science of Science\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-04-03T11:46:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/arhiv\/2023-2\/1-119\/1-8\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/arhiv\/2023-2\/1-119\/1-8\/\",\"name\":\"1.8 - Science and Science of Science\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-03-15T14:31:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-04-03T11:46:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/arhiv\/2023-2\/1-119\/1-8\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/arhiv\/2023-2\/1-119\/1-8\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/arhiv\/2023-2\/1-119\/1-8\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u041f\u0440\u043e \u0436\u0443\u0440\u043d\u0430\u043b\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"\u0410\u0440\u0445\u0456\u0432\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/arhiv\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":4,\"name\":\"2023\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/arhiv\/2023-2\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":5,\"name\":\"\u21161 (119)\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/arhiv\/2023-2\/1-119\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":6,\"name\":\"1.8\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/\",\"name\":\"Science and Science of Science\",\"description\":\"international scientific journal\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"1.8 - Science and Science of Science","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/arhiv\/2023-2\/1-119\/1-8\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"1.8 - Science and Science of Science","og_url":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/arhiv\/2023-2\/1-119\/1-8\/","og_site_name":"Science and Science of Science","article_modified_time":"2023-04-03T11:46:48+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/arhiv\/2023-2\/1-119\/1-8\/","url":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/arhiv\/2023-2\/1-119\/1-8\/","name":"1.8 - Science and Science of Science","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/#website"},"datePublished":"2023-03-15T14:31:08+00:00","dateModified":"2023-04-03T11:46:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/arhiv\/2023-2\/1-119\/1-8\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/arhiv\/2023-2\/1-119\/1-8\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/arhiv\/2023-2\/1-119\/1-8\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u041f\u0440\u043e \u0436\u0443\u0440\u043d\u0430\u043b","item":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"\u0410\u0440\u0445\u0456\u0432","item":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/arhiv\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"2023","item":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/arhiv\/2023-2\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":5,"name":"\u21161 (119)","item":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/sample-page\/arhiv\/2023-2\/1-119\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":6,"name":"1.8"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/#website","url":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/","name":"Science and Science of Science","description":"international scientific journal","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6317"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6317"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6317\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6572,"href":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6317\/revisions\/6572"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6285"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sofs.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6317"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}