sofs.org.ua › About us › Archive › 2024 › №1 (123) › 1.3

1.3

ORGANIZATION OF ECONOMIC RELATIONS ON NATURE USE IN THE RECONSTRUCTIVE DEVELOPMENT OF TERRITORIES

V.V. MYKYTENKO
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8212-9777
Institute of Demography and Quality of Life Problems of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

Nauka naukozn. 2024, 1(123): 21—42
https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2024.01.021 

Section: Science and Innovation-driven Development of Economy and Society
Language: Ukrainian
Abstract: An innovative universal set of principled approaches to the organization, rationalization and harmonization of management of economic relations on nature use in the reconstructive development of territorial formations was formed in order to ensure their structural and informational reliability and increase the scale and efficiency of reconstruction. The construction of co-adaptive principles is based on the capital-oriented provisions of the identification of space as an asset that creates added value; flow-process regulations for the implementation of reconstructive development in the following directions: spatial development, territorial development, development of territories; ecosystem provisions for determining the contamination, regeneration and assimilation properties of the management space. Three stages of reconstructive spatial development of territorial formations in reformatting management of economic relations on nature use are defined: 1) reconstructive development of infrastructure and economy given the ecological sustainability of territories; 2) reconstructive social development of territories given intensifying industrial and economic and interregional interaction; 3) reconstructive architectural and planning development of territories. Four types of economic activity in the territories are defined, with detailing their characteristics and features that meet the acceptable criteria of the results’ value: 1) economic activity with a high efficiency of the system for management and use of natural resource assets, as well as the high potential of these assets; 2) economic activity with an average efficiency of the system for management and use of natural resource assets; 3) economic activity with low efficiency of the system for management and use of natural resource assets, but with great potential; 4) economic activity with a large scale of natural resource potential, but with a low efficiency of the management system.

Keywords: management of economic relations on nature use, natural resource assets, reconstructive development, territorial formations, economic activity.

References

  1. Khvesyk, M.A., & Bystryakov, I.K. (2014). Financial and economic levers of capitalization of natural resources in the context of ensuring profitable use of nature. Finance of Ukraine, 5, 29—47 [in Ukrainian].
  2. Khvesyk, M.A., Bystryakov, I.K., & Klinovy, D.V. (2016). Spatial organization and directions of use of natural wealth of Ukraine. Ukrainian Economy, 7 (656), 46—65 [in Ukrainian].
  3. Bystryakov, I.K., & Klinovy, D.V. (2020). Business ecosystem concept of sustainable management. Economics of Nature Management and Sustainable Development, 8 (27), 21—27. https://doi.org/10.37100/2616-7689/2020/8(27)/3 [in Ukrainian].
  4. Koval, V.V., & Mykytenko, V.V. (2021). Sustainable management: determinants and management technologies. Odesa: The Southern Research Center of the NAS of Ukraine and the Ministry for Education and Science of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
  5. Horditsa, K.A., Horin, N.O., Bodnarchuk, T.L., Nebrat, V.V., & Suprun, N.A. (2014). The Ukrainian economic opinion on the factors and priorities of economic development. Kyiv: Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
  6. Hrytsenko, A.A., Heiets, V.M., Nebrat, V.V., Deineko, L.V., Borodina, O.M., & Nykyforuk, O.I. (2016). Reconstructive economic development: main directions, effi ciency and social justice. Kyiv: Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
  7. Mykytenko, V.V. (2023). Ensuring sustainable management: streamlining management actions. International scientific and practical conference “The Balanced Nature Use: Traditions, Prospects and Innovations”. Part 1. Kyiv: Institute of Agroecology and Environmental Management of the National Academy of Agricultural Sciences of Ukraine, 125—128 [in Ukrainian].
  8. Mykytenko, V.V. (2019). A system-ordered combination of value-oriented dominants in the formation of natural and economic space. Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development, 6 (25), 37—43. https://doi.org/10.37100/2616-7689/2019/6(25)/6 [in Ukrainian].
  9. Pampuro, V.I. (1992). Structural information theory of system reliability. Kyiv: Institute of Electrodynamics of the NAS of Ukraine. Naukova dumka [in Russian].
  10. Mykytenko, V.V., Rohov, P.D., Khomik, M.V., Khoroshylova, S.J., & Biletskyi, O.М. (2021). Formalization of the process of sustainable management in a three-dimensional coordinate system: time — money — space coverage. Journal of Scientific Papers “Social Development and Security”, 11 (6), 231—247. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2021.11.6.18 [in Ukrainian].
  11. Bondarenko, S. Liganenko, І., & Mykytenko, V. (2020). Transformation of public administration in digital conditions: world experience, prospects of Ukraine. Journal of Scientific Papers “Social Development and Security”, 10 (2), 76—89. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2020.10.2.9
  12. Veklych, O.О. (2020). Essential characteristic of ecosystem assets of territorial communities. Effective Economy, 5. https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2020.5.17 [in Ukrainian].
  13. Veklych, O.О. (2020). Ecosystem assets of territorial communities are a determinant of ensuring and strengthening their development capacity. 3rd International scientific and practical conference «Today’s Economy: Current Issues and Innovative Aspects». Zaporizhzhia: East Ukrainian Institute for Economics and Management, 23—26 [in Ukrainian].

Full Text (PDF)