sofs.org.ua › About us › Archive › 2021 › №3 (113) › 1.2

1.2

CONCEPTUAL FEATURES OF SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT

I.К. BYSTRIAKOV1
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6482-7099

D.V. KLYNOVYI1
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3034-8097
1 Institute of Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Nauka naukozn. 2021, 3(113): 3-19
https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2021.03.003

Section: Science and Innovation-driven development of economy and society
Language: Ukrainian
Abstract: The authors investigated the possibilities of organizing sustainable management on the basis of modernized scientific principles of sustainable development and approaches to finansomics. The methodological framework of the research presented in the article is traditional general and special methods of scientific knowledge (monographic, analytical, modeling, etc.), adapted, according to the logic of solving the sustainable management problem, to the latest conditions when natural resources are considered as economic assets.

The essential features of the sustainable management concept are outlined from the sustainable management perspective and in the context of the increasing role of financial assets in the formation of environmentally and socially friendly life space of business entities. The sustainable management concept emphasizes the need to bring modern approaches to the physical economy in conformity with the environmental economics and the classical approach of economic theory.

Proposals for financization of the natural and economic sphere on the basis of sustainability and improvement of financial logistics in the natural resource sphere are given. It is stressed that financial capital should reach the nature use sphere in form of initial investment and operating capital, as well as reinvestment and financial flows aimed at rehabilitation of natural resources. It is determined that part of the withdrawn natural rent, if reinvested in the rehabilitation of natural assets, will make spatial socio-ecological-economic systems operate in a sustainable mode, but this would require appropriate institutional transformations and established infrastructures for capitalization of natural resources.

The authors have elaborated and proposed a model of the dynamics of the ratio of investment in the natural economic system and the effect of achieving sustainable management in the foresight project as a tool for multi-subject management of sustainable development; and an algorithmic diagram of sustainable management by use of information and communication platforms for managing territorial resources. This approach is supposed to ensure effective financing of the natural economy using the mechanisms of structural management and securitization of natural resources, “green” financial assets and other tools of the modern finansomics.

Keywords: natural resources, natural capital, economic theory, physical economy, sustainable management, finansomics, multi-subject management, foresight project.

References

  1. Avdokushin, Е.F., & Sizov, В.С. (2014). New economy: theory and practice. Moscow: Magistr [in Russian]. https://doi.org/10.12737/2588
  2. Faichuk, О.М., & Akulovych, Yu.А. (2019). New economy for the achievement of sustainable development goals in Ukraine. Bulletin of Economics in Ukraine, 2(37), 21—26. https://doi.org/10.37405/1729-7206.2019.2(37).21-26 [in Ukrainian].
  3. Pshyk, V.І. (2013). Finansonomics as an innovative area of economics: essence, origins, specifics of manifestation. Bulletin of National Bank of Ukraine, 7, 55—61 [in Ukrainian].
  4. Naiko, D.A., & Shevchuk, O.F. (2011). Physical economics and its problems. Proceedings of VNAU. A Series of Economic Science, 1(48), 265—272 [in Ukrainian].
  5. Korniychuk, L.Y., & Shevchuk, V.O. (2012). Futurology and Prognostic Ideas of Physical Economy. Kyiv: Kyiv National Economic University; National Academy of Statistics. Accounting and Audit [in Ukrainian].
  6. Shkarlet, S.M., & Mykytenko, V.V. (2020). Transformation of ideas about sustainable management: opportunities for scientific and technological development. Science and science of science, 4(110), 6—23. https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2020.04.006 [in Ukrainian].
  7. Bystryakov, I.K., & Klynovyy, D.V. (2020). Business ecosystem concept of sustainable management. Economics of nature management and sustainable development, 8(27), 21—27. https://doi.org/10.37100/2616-7689/2020/8(27)/3 [in Ukrainian].
  8. Bystryakov, I.K., & Klynovyy, D.V. (2019). Platform economy of spatial business ecosystems as an innovative trend of sustainable development. Science and science of science, 3(105), 3—25. https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2019.03.003 [in Ukrainian].
  9. Costanza, R., & Daly, H. (1992). Natural Capital and Sustainable Development. Conservation Biology, 6, 37—46. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610037.x
  10. Folke, C., Hammer, M., Costanza, R., & Jansson, A. (1994). Investing in Natural Capital: The Ecological Economics Approach to Sustainability. Washington: Island Press.
  11. Olewiler, N. (2002). Natural Capital, Sustainability and Productivity: An Exploration of the Linkages. The Review of Economic Performance and Social Progress 2002: Towards a Social Understanding of Productivity. 117—142. Montreal: The Institute for Research on public Policy. URL: http://www.csls.ca/repsp/2/nancyolewiler.pdf (last accessed: 01.06.2021).
  12. Brand, F. (2009). Critical Natural Capital Revisited: Ecological resilience and sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 68, 605—612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.013
  13. Pyrozhkov, S.I., & Khvesyk, M.A. (Ed.). (2015). Economic Assessment of Natural Wealth of Ukraine. Kyiv: Institute of Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
  14. Khvesyk, M.A. (Ed.). (2013). Comprehensive Economic Assessment of Natural Resources. Kyiv: Institute of Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
  15. Pezzey, J. (1992). Sustainable Development Concepts. An Economic Analysis. World Bank Environment Paper Number 2. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-2278-8
  16. Moiseev, R.S. (2006). On the question of the theory of “human” and “natural” capital. Environmental economy, 1, 5—22 [in Russian].
  17. Quesnay, F. (1960) Selected Economic Works. Moscow: Sotsekgiz [in Russian].
  18. Philosophy of Physical Economics: Conversation of Professor T.V. Muranivsky with L. LaRouche (2008). Moscow: EIR [in Russian].
  19. Allais, M., & Feiwel, G.R. (Eds.). (1987). The Credit Mechanism and Its Implications. Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy. 491—561. New York: New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07357-3_19
  20. Zinchenko, V.V. (2012). Physical economy as a management model for competitive planning of maximal efficiency. Actual Problems of Economics. Scientific Economic Journal, 8 (134), 10—18 [in Ukrainian].
  21. Rudenko, M.D. (2001). Gnosis and Modernity: (Architecture of the Universe). Ternopil: Dzhura [in Ukrainian].
  22. Rudenko, M.D. (2000). The Energy of Progress. (Essays on Physical Economy). Ternopil: Dzhura [in Ukrainian].
  23. Podolinsky, S.A. (2000). Selected Works. Кyiv: Kyiv National Economic University; International Institute for Business Education [in Ukrainian].
  24. Podolinsky, S.A. (1991). Human Labor and its Relation to the Distribution of Energy. Moscow: Noosfera [in Russian].
  25. Lupenko, Yu.O., Zhuk, V.M., Shevchuk,V.O. & Khodakivska, O.V. (Eds.) (2013). Physical Economy in the Dimensions of the Theory and Practice of Management. Kyiv: Institute of Agrarian Economy [in Ukrainian].
  26. Davydyants, D.E. (2016). Physical economics: theory, methodology, system-forming principles. Moscow: MIRAKL. https://doi.org/10.24923/peco.2016.1 [in Russian].

Full Text (PDF)