1.6

FOREIGN PRACTICES OF WORK WITH SCIENTIFIC YOUTH: THE CASE OF YOUNG ACADEMIES

1 А.С. VASHULENKO

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6560-7864

1G.M. Dobrov Institute for Scientific and Technological Potential and Science History Studies of the NAS of Ukraine

Nauka naukozn. 2018, 1(99): 61-72

https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2018.01.061

Section: Foreign science

Language: Ukrainian

Abstract: Because engagement of the young generation in R&D is an issue of critical importance for Ukraine, the article contains an extensive review of foreign practices in working with scientific youth. It shows that the so called young academies which mission is to draw attention to the problems faced by young researchers represent a conventional form of work with scientific youth. According to official data, by 2017 young academies helping to enhance the R&D activity of young scientists had been created in 30 countries. The first young academy was created in Germany in 2000; similar academies were established thereafter in the Netherlands (2005), Sudan and Austria (2007). The article provides information about the history of the young academy in Germany and some other countries, the history of Global Young Academy (GYA) created in 2000, its objectives and membership conditions. A central purpose of GYA is to support creation and development of national young academies and to cooperate with them. The number of GYA members is 200. The GYA membership can be granted to scientists younger than 35, the membership term is four years. The membership conditions are high qualification and achievements in R&D, to be supported by recommendations of outstanding scientists from any national organization of an applicant’s country. The Ukrainian practices in creating youth entities in R&D are shown by case of Councils of Young Scientists. It is concluded from the analysis that Ukraine actually needs to create an organization analogous to the young academy, to have talented youth engaged in R&D.

Keywords: young academy, Global Young Academy, young scientists, Council of Young Scientists.

References

  1. Dezhyna, I.G. (2006). Staff problems in the Russian R&D and initiatives of the state. Science and Science of Science, 1, 28–34 [in Russian].
  2. Artyukhin, M.I. (ed.) (2010). Research staff in the context of the innovation-driven development of the Republic of Belarus. Minsk: “Belarus. Nauka”, 323 [in Russian].
  3. The science, technology and innovation system in Moldova, Armenia, Azerbaijan. Research potential of the Black sea. Deliverables: Volume I. Athens, July 2006.
  4. Dimitruk, P.P. (2011). Young in R&D in Belarus. Problems of management, 3(40), 96–103 [in Russian].
  5. Allakhverdyan, А.G. (2015). The dynamics of R&D personnel in post-soviet Russia: a comparative scientific analysis. Science and Science of Science, 2, 58–65 [in Russian].
  6. The Law of Ukraine “Science and science and technology activities”. Retrieved from http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/848-19. [in Ukrainian].
  7. Malitsky, B.А. (1979). Forming age structure of R&D personnel by the phase balance method. Kiev: Publishing house of the Institute of Cybernetics of the Academy of Sciences of the UkrSSR, 28 p. [in Russian].
  8. Egorov, I.Yu. (2000). The dynamics of R&D personnel in the Ukrainian R&D in 1990s: some results and projections. Problems of science, 11, 6–11 [in Russian].
  9. Boublyk, S.H. The age factor of R&D personnel. Problems of science, 2, 9–15 [in Ukrainian].
  10. Vashulenko, О.S. (2009). The age structure of R&D personnel in the R&D system of Ukraine. Science and Science of Science, 3, 31–45 [in Ukrainian].
  11. Popovych, О.S., Kostrytsia, О.P. (2015). Change in the age structure of researchers in the Ukrainian R&D. Science and Science of Science, 4, 52–66 [in Ukrainian].
  12. Bulkin, І.О. (2016). Peculiarities of the Age Structure of R&D Personnel in the NAS of Ukraine as the Leading Component in the National R&D System, Science and Science of Science, 2, 50–62 [in Ukrainian].
  13. Dobrov, G.M. (1989). Science about science. 3rd ed., suppl. and revised. Kiev: Naukova dumka, 304 [in Russian].
  14. Dobrov, G.M., Tonkal, V.Ye., Saveliyev, A.А., et al. (1988). The science and technology potential: structure, dynamics, effectiveness. Kiev: Naukova dumka, 347 [in Russian].
  15. Malytskiy, B., Onoprienko, V., Kavunenko, L. (1998). Toward a National STS in Ukraine. Transforming Science and Technology Systems – the Endless Transition? (pp. 129–140). IOS Press, the Netherlands.
  16. Performance and development prospects of the National Academy of Sciences ofUkraine. A brief report on the results of a sociological interview of researchers from the NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv, 2004. 58 p. [inUkrainian].
  17. Saveliyev, A.А., Malitsky, B.A., Onopriyenko, V.I. Youth in R&D. 1990s: a sociological study. Kiev: G.M. Dobrov Center for Scientific and Technological Potential and Science History Studies of the NAS of Ukraine, 2000, 48 p. [in Russian].
  18. Zhabin, S.O., Kazmina, O.P., Vashulenko, O.S., Sosnov, O.S. (2016). Analysis of Data from Sociological Study of Young Researchers from the NAS of Ukraine in 2015. Science and Science of Science, 2, 62–77 [in Ukrainian].
  19. Data from a sociological survey conducted by the Council of Young Scientists of Dnipropetrovsk region on line of the governor’s grant “Young scientists of Dipropetrovsk region”, 2010. Retrieved from http://gurt.org.ua/blogs/Аліна%20Солнишкіна%20/755/?order=comments
  20. https://globalyoungacademy.net

Text (PDF)