1 Dobrov Institute for Scientific and Technological Potential and Science History Studies of the NAS of Ukraine

Nauka naukozn. 2021, 3(113): 20-38

Section: Problems of the development of science and technology potential
Language: Ukrainian
Abstract: While OECD governments invested significant funds in research and development (R&D), Ukraine features the more and more pronounced downward trend in budgetary funding of R&D Ukraine. A comparative analysis of the government R&D financing in Ukraine and OECD countries will be topical given the importance of preservation and performance enhancement of the Ukrainian R&D. As limited financial resources of the government cannot allow for performing R&D in all the priority thematic fields, this raises the importance of their updating and informed selection.

The article’s objective is to present the results of a study of current trends in the financial support of the R&D sector in Ukraine, and changes in the dynamics and structure of national science and technology priorities and their compliance with global trends; to discuss the author’s approach to setting up and financing priority thematic areas of scientific research.

Results of a comparative analysis of budgetary R&D expenditure in Ukraine and selected OECD countries revealed the gap between the budgetary funding of R&D in Ukraine and global trends; they showed that the government spending in OECD countries was the main source of funds for basic research, and gave the authors evidence for substantiating the expediency of a significant increase in the government support to basic, exploratory and applied research in Ukraine.

An in-depth analysis of the structural change in the budgetary funding of priority science and technology areas in Ukraine was made. A review of data on R&D funding from the US federal budget was carried out. Data on the investment allocated by the US government in priority science and technology areas are given. It is demonstrated that the budgetary expenditure for R&D in Ukraine in all the priority areas were extremely low if compared with developed countries.

It is concluded that Ukraine needs to radically change the approach to capacity building in R&D, especially its financing, in keeping with current global trends, and to create an effective mechanism for priority setting in the science & technology field and coordination of research with consideration to the competitive advantages of domestic research and forecasts, as well as global trends in science and technology.

Keywords: research and development, public budget, government financing of research and development, priority areas of science and technology, basic research, applied research.


  1. Bulkin, I.А. (2019). Priorities of R&D financing in Ukraine from internal sources of science and technology organizations. Part IІ. Science and Science of Science, 2, 195—104. https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2019.02.095 [in Ukrainian].
  2. Malitsky, B.А. (2014). Science, technology, innovation and national security: theoretical and applied aspects. Кyiv: “Sofia” [in Ukrainian].
  3. Malitsky, B.А. (2017). Science Policy and Science History Studies: Looking into the Past, the Present, and the Future. Science and Science of Science, 2, 28—42. https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2017.02.028 [in Ukrainian].
  4. Mekh, O.A. (2017). Transformations of Academy Science in 20th Century: the Background for Formation of the Contemporary Science and Technology Sector in Ukraine. Science and Science of Science, 2, 28—43. https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2017.03.054 [in Ukrainian].
  5. (2020) The interview the president of the NAS of Ukraine academician Boris Paton. Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 1, 3—10 [in Ukrainian].
  6. Popovych, A.S., & Kostritsa, E.P. (2017). Restoring the Scientific Potential of Ukrainian Science: Necessity and Real Prospects. Nauka innov, 4, 5—13. https://doi.org/10.15407/scin13.03.005 [in Ukrainian].
  7. Popovych, O.S., & Velenteichyk, Т.M. (2010). The Policy of Priorities in Science & Technology and Innovation Development. Science and Science of Science, 1, 13—27 [in Ukrainian].
  8. Loktev, V. (2020). Is there a chance to restore the prestige of science in Ukraine. Bulletin of the NAS of Ukraine, 9, 12—29. https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2020.09.012 [in Ukrainian].
  9. Grachev, О., & Rybachuk, V. (2018). The academy form for organization of R&D: objective tendencies of development and anti-academy criticism. Science and Science of Science, 4, 72—89. https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2018.04.072 [in Russian].
  10. Rybachuk, V., & Quist, G. (2018). National academies of sciences in the global information space: a webometric evaluation. Science and Science of Science, 3, 36—49. https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2018.03.036 [in Ukrainian].
  11. Ovcharova, L. (2016). Development of the world sector of science: statistical analysis. Modern Problems of Economics and Business. 17, 28—36. URL: http://sb-keip.kpi.ua/issue/view/3977 (last accessed: 15.02.2021) [in Ukrainian].
  12. Ovcharova, L., & Bodeko, V. (2017). Economic assessment of the state and trends in the formation of human resources in the academic sector of science. Modern Problems of Economics and Business, 19, 67—75. URL: http://sb-keip.kpi.ua/issue/view/6113 (last accessed: 15.02.2021) [in Ukrainian].
  13. Ovcharova, L. (2018). Actual trends of the development of the scientific and technical sphere in the foreign countries, Modern Problems of Economics and Business, 21, 19—29. URL: http://sb-keip.kpi.ua/article/view/124122 (last accessed: 15.02.2021) [in Ukrainian].
  14. Ovcharova, L., & Bodeko, V. (2019). Funding of scientific research and development in Ukraine: state, problems and prospects. Modern Problems of Economics and Business, 24, 76—88. URL: http://sb-keip.kpi.ua/issue/view/12007 (last accessed: 15.02.2021) [in Ukrainian].
  15. Lebedeva, L., & Emelianov, S. (2017). USA: new trends in shaping budget policy. International Trade and Trade Policy, 3(11), 120—133 [in Russian].
  16. Lebedeva, L.F. (Ed.). (2017). US Federal Budget During the Barack Obama Presidency. The Federal Budgetary Institution of Science of the United States and Canada Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow: Ves Myr [in Russian].
  17. Romaniuk, О. (2021). President of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine A. Zahorodnii: “There is immense demand in the society for constructive discussions and scientific knowledge, and we just have to meet it”. ZN,ua. URL: https://zn.ua/ukr/science/prezidentnanu-anatolij-zahorodnij-u-suspilstvi-isnuje-velicheznij-zapit-na-konstruktivni-diskusijita-naukovi-znannja-i-mi-prosto-zobovjazani-joho-zadovolniti.html (last accessed: 15.03.2021) [in Ukrainian].
  18. Zvarych, O. (2021). Man-made nature of COVID-19, biological weapon and Ukrainian tests: interview of Academician of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine M. Tukal. Ukrainska Pravda. Zhyttia. URL: https://life.pravda.com.ua/health/2020/05/21/241056/ (last accessed: 06.04.2021) [in Ukrainian].
  19. Vishnevsky V.P., & Kniaziev S.I. (2018). How to Increase the Readiness of Ukraine’s Industry to Smart Transformations. Nauka innov., 14(4), 55—69. https://doi.org/10.15407/scin14.04.055 [in Ukrainian].
  20. Bulkin, І.A. (2016). Priorities of R&D Financing per Employee in Ukraine in Disciplinary Aspect. Science and Science of Science, 3, 71—88 [in Russian].
  21. Pysarenko, T.V., & Kuranda, T.K. (Eds.) (2020). Science and science and technology activity in Ukraine in 2019. Kyiv: UkrINTEI [in Ukrainian].

Full Text (PDF)