sofs.org.ua › About us › Archive › 2022 › №3(117) › 1.7

1.7

FUNDING FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE UNITED STATES: DYNAMICS, STRUCTURE AND PRIORITIES

L.P. OVCHAROVA 1
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1550-2308
V.P. RYBACHUK 1
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4614-2763
V.P. BODEKO 1
1 Dobrov Institute for Scientific and Technological Potential and Science History Studies of the NAS of Ukraine

Nauka naukozn. 2022, 3(117): 81–102
https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2022.03.081

Section: Foreign science. International science and technology cooperation
Language: Ukrainian
Abstract: A key characteristic of the status of a national science and technology complex in any country is its funding. By investing heavily in R&D, developed countries could achieve the global leadership and global competitiveness of the national economy. Analysis of the distinctive features of financial support to research institutions in the U.S., structural change and priorities of the public policy in R&D is important given the high performance of the American R&D and its leadership by global investment in R&D. The aim of the article is to present the results of the study on the transformative change in the financing of research entities in the U.S.: national laboratories, universities and business sector.

By a review of international organizations’ reports, analytical material of experts from the Congressional Research Service, National Science Foundation, annual budget reports of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the authors identified current trends in R&D funding, factors determining the amount and trends on R&D funding from the federal budget; highlighted the U.S. rank in the global science indicators. An analysis of science indicators for the U.S. showed that in the face of growing budget constraints, internal and external challenges, R&D investment in the U.S. was growing annually throughout 60 years in business sector and federal government; the share of federal government spending on R&D in GDP has declined since the 1970s, with the share of the business sector increased; the share of R&D expenditures on basic research has reduced.

The authors demonstrate that the U.S. leadership in science and technology has been achieved due to long-term investment in R&D, allowing the U.S. to produce results capable to meet the needs of the American society and ensure industrial efficiency and national security. The basis for success of the American R&D was the consistent and balanced policy of the federal government aimed at consolidating the national R&D capacity; implementation of advanced tools and schemes for science and technology policy; adjustments of budget priorities and areas of R&D funding in view of global and domestic challenges.

Keywords: research and development, science and technology complex, federal budget, federal government, research institutions, basic research, applied research.

References

  1. Gruber, J., & Johnson, S. (2019). Jump-Starting America. How Breakthrough Science Can Revive Economic Growth and the American Dream. Public Affairs. New York.
  2. Dickson, D. (1984). The New Politics of Science. New York.
  3. (2014). Restoring the Foundation: The Vital Role of Research in Preserving the American Dream. Report SEP. URL: https://www.amacad.org/sites/default/files/publication/ resources/AmericanAcad_RestoringtheFoundation_Brief.pdf (last accessed: 20.04.2022).
  4. Hourihan, М. (2012). Historical Trends in Federal R&D. Аmerican Association for the Advancement of Science. URL: https://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/14pch02.pdf (last accessed: 20.04.2022).
  5. Zimmermann, А. & Hourihan, М. (2022). R&D and Innovation in a Global Context: Data Update. URL: https://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/2022-05/AAAS%20Global%20R% 26D%20Update%20May%202022.pdf (last accessed: 20.04.2022).
  6. Hourihan, M., & Parkes, D. (2019). R&D in the FY 2020 White House Budget: An Overview. American Association for the Advancement of Science. URL: https://www.aaas.org/news/ rd-fy-2020-white-house-budget-overview (last accessed: 20.04.2022).
  7. Hourihan, M. (2021). Some Facts about the Biden R&D Budget. American Association for the Advancement of Science. URL: https://www.aaas.org/news/ biden-rd-budget (last accessed: 20.04.2022).
  8. Popovych, Z.O. (2021). New Aspects in the US Administration’s Science and Technology Policy. Science and Science of Science, 2, 100–102 [in Ukrainian].
  9. Рopovych, O.S. & Velenteichyk, Т.M. (2010). The Policy of Priorities in Science & Technology and Innovation Development. Science and Science of Science, 1, 13–27 [in Ukrainian].
  10. Popovich, O.S., & Ryzhko, L.V. (2022). Modern challenges to science and ways to overcome them. Science and Science of Science, 1, 88–104. https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2022.01.088 [in Ukrainian].
  11. Ovcharova, L. (2016). Development of the world sector of science: statistical analysis. Modern Problems of Economics and Business. 17, 28–36. URL: http://sb-keip.kpi.ua/issue/view/3977 (last accessed: 15.04.2022) [in Ukrainian].
  12. Ovcharova, L. (2018). Actual trends of the development of the scientific and technical sphere in the foreign countries. Modern Problems of Economics and Business, 21, 19–29 [in Ukrainian].
  13. Rybachuk, V.P., & Ovcharova, L.P. (2021). State funding of research and development in priority areas of development of science and technology: national characteristics. Science and Science of Science, 3, 20–38. https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2021.03.020 [in Ukrainian].

Full Text (PDF)